Closing Comments

I wish that I could wrap this all up in profoundly new words for you, but I can't.  The absurd simplicity of my notions are not draped in the high language of mathematics.  But hopefully, that will not discount them.  It just seems to me that no aspect of the universe is alien to itself.  The continuity and accessibility has to be complete in order for us to exist at all, and so we should be able to talk about them in many ways, retaining validity and relation, in those alternative ways.

It behooves us to explore the similarities of dynamics and relationships. It behooves us not to be overwhelmed by the diversity and differentness.  In the final view -  following Shannon's ideas about what makes systems stable and long lasting - it is diversity and intricacy and rich embellishments that make existence strong and enduring.  We may be constructed from just a few elegant relationships, but the ways the universe finds to express itself and even understand itself, is absolutely marvelous and thrilling.

I may not be correct down to the last detail in some of the ideas you've heard presented here, but I stand tall with the notion that our ancestor's concepts of Unity and wholism amidst all the diversity did not pass unrecognized by them.  We today are looking for deeper ways to appreciate this organization of being, looking constantly for tools and opportunities to carry our species and all possibilities of evolution and advancement into a great and open future.

We commune with ourselves and with one another, and establish that we are baton carries of competent sentience.  We are open to look at ourselves and existence in alternative ways.  The glass half filled with water is completely filled with both necessities of life ... air and water.  Our largest organ of balance is not the parts of our inner ear but our entire musculature and nerves, by which we sense our orientation in the field of gravity.  The standard version of what information "is" or "isn't" needs to be openly reconsidered.

We have to allow that "potential" can generate "reality" -- real, effective and tangible.  Form and function are one.  And in the end I can only offer a perception of how I view our universe, in the hopes that we can improve our performance within it.  From my abstract:

Specific non-traditional notions are : 

1) Topology is not an inert model of organization. It is transmutable
    dimensionality which induces real differential densities, real structural
    gradients and therefore real fields.

2) Entropy/Negentropy is the fundamental 'force' of Dimensional Topology.

3) Time is a real plural-dimensioned architecture, in keeping with ideas of
    phasespace.

4) Local entropy processes co-produce negentropy and thus complexity.

5) Sentience is dialogue among 'self' and 'else'. It's foundation is the active
    self-referential structure of the universe, where 'locality' and 'non-locality'
    are artifacts of how dimensions are conditionally configured, expressed,
    encountered.

     Now, let's talk ... !